|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 11, 2021 7:06:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 11, 2021 10:30:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 12, 2021 6:42:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 12, 2021 14:05:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 13, 2021 8:29:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 13, 2021 11:43:43 GMT
Scrill down through the twit for mor vids.thems australians are pissed.
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 13, 2021 12:07:13 GMT
www.bitchute.com/video/JV7dONzrHyAT/I think this is hillarious! Sucks to be you! Half the guards in jail got vaccinated voluntarily.i told one he shouldnt have done that as he looked down his nose at me with that shit eating grin. So far we got folks saying squid,magnetics,carbon nanotubes. Lol,no kitchen sink yet! Freakin lab rats gonna end up in matrix pods soon,jacked in like batteries,waiting to get liquified.
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 13, 2021 13:49:51 GMT
"$44 billion appropriated for bio-warfare research since 9-11 A number of major pharmaceutical corporations and biotech firms are concealing the nature of the biological warfare research work they are doing for the U.S. government.
Since their funding comes from the National Institutes of Health, the recipients are obligated under NIH guidelines to make their activities public. Not disclosing their ops raises the suspicion they may be engaged in forbidden kinds of germ warfare research.
According to the Sunshine Project, a nonprofit arms control watchdog operating out of Austin, Texas, among corporations holding back information about their activities are:
Abbott Laboratories, BASF Plant Science, Bristol-Myers Squibb, DuPont Central Research and Development, Eli Lilly Corp., Embrex, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-LaRoche, Merck & Co., Monsanto, Pfizer Inc., Schering-Plough Research Institute, and Syngenta Corp. of Switzerland.
In defiance of international conventions that prohibit the stockpiling and development of biological weapons, the Bush administration and its corporate cronies have been diverting billions of dollars to do both. Under the guise of preventing terrorist attacks (“bio-defense”) companies have been working on “first-use” capabilities and “red teaming” their techniques, a codeword for planning their use in war. --------- One would think the FBI might apprehend the perpetrator whose attack shut down the Congress of the United States but nearly six years have gone by and it hasn't caught anybody. Seem a bit odd to you? Some folks suspect the anthrax attack was an inside job to panic the country into a huge biowarfare buildup to "protect" America from "terrorists."
Milton Leitenberg, of the University of Maryland's School of Public Policy, though, says the risk of terrorists and nonstate actors using biological agents against the U.S. "has been systematically and deliberately exaggerated" by administration scare-mongering. --------- And molecular biologist Jonathan King of Massachusetts Institute of Technology says, "the Bush administration launched a major program which threatens to put the health of our people at far greater risk than the hazard to which they claimed to have been responding." King added President Bush's policies "do not increase the security of the American people" but "bring new risk to our population of the most appalling kind."
In the absence of any credible foreign threat, Sunshine's Hammond said, "Our biowarfare research is defending ourselves from ourselves. It's a dog chasing its tail." Sadly, it looks more and more every day like a mad dog"
Im cautious of quoting without link.i pulled this earlier from another forum.
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 13, 2021 14:10:10 GMT
www.naturalnews.com/index.htmlNotice the doj remark about xylitol? Xylitol knocks out a tooth infection fast and is in trident gum. Anytime my 3 abcessed teeth give me problems that gum saves me 1000s in dollars. Who wins if xylitol is outlawed? Also read the australia lifetime vax story.vax junkies. Big pharma plans to threaten us with biowarfare if we dont pay the protection racket.
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 13, 2021 14:46:37 GMT
Experts Defining Mental Disorders Are Linked to Drug Firms
Washington Post
2006-04-20
Every psychiatric expert involved in writing the standard diagnostic criteria for disorders such as depression and schizophrenia has had financial ties to drug companies that sell medications for those illnesses, a new analysis has found.
Of the 170 experts in all who contributed to the manual that defines disorders from personality problems to drug addiction, more than half had such ties, including 100 percent of the experts who served on work groups on mood disorders and psychotic disorders. The analysis did not reveal the extent of their relationships with industry or whether those ties preceded or followed their work on the manual.
"I don't think the public is aware of how egregious the financial ties are in the field of psychiatry," said Lisa Cosgrove, a clinical psychologist at the University of Massachusetts in Boston, who is publishing her analysis today in the peer-reviewed journal Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.
The analysis comes at a time of growing debate over the rising use of medication as the primary or sole treatment for many psychiatric disorders, a trend driven in part by definitions of mental disorders in the psychiatric manual.
Cosgrove said she began her research after discovering that five of six panel members studying whether certain premenstrual problems are a psychiatric disorder had ties to Eli Lilly & Co., which was seeking to market its drug Prozac to treat those symptoms. The process of defining such disorders is far from scientific, Cosgrove added: "You would be dismayed at how political the process can be."
The American Psychiatric Association, which publishes the guidelines in its bible of disorders, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), said it is planning to require disclosure of the financial ties of experts who write the next edition of the manual -- due around 2011. The manual carries vast influence over the practice of psychiatry in the United States and around the world.
Darrel Regier, director of the association's division of research, said that concerns over disclosure are a relatively recent phenomenon, which may be why the last edition, published in 1994, did not note them. Regier and John Kane, an expert on schizophrenia who worked on the last edition, agreed with the need for transparency but said financial ties with industry should not undermine public confidence in the conclusions of its experts. Kane has been a consultant to drug companies including Abbott Laboratories, Eli Lilly, Janssen and Pfizer Inc.
"It shouldn't be assumed there is a true conflict of interest," said Kane, who said his panel's conclusions were driven only by science. "To me, a conflict of interest implies that someone's judgment is going to be influenced by this relationship, and that is not necessarily the case. . . ."
The DSM defines disorders in terms of constellations of symptoms. While neuroscience and genetics are revealing biological aspects to many disorders, there has been unease that psychiatry is ignoring social, psychological and cultural factors in its pursuit of biological explanations and treatments.
"As a profession, we have allowed the biopsychosocial model to become the bio-bio-bio model," Steven Sharfstein, president of the American Psychiatric Association, said in an essay last year to his colleagues. He later added, "If we are seen as mere pill pushers and employees of the pharmaceutical industry, our credibility as a profession is compromised."
He stressed that the association has strict guidelines to police the role of the pharmaceutical industry but said the profession as a whole needs to do a better job monitoring ethical conflicts.
Sharfstein added yesterday that the presence of experts with ties to companies on the manual's expert panels is understandable, given that many of the top experts in the field are involved in drug research.
"I am not surprised that the key people who participate have these kinds of relationships," he said. "They are the major researchers in the field, and are very much on the cutting edge, and will have some kind of relationship -- but there should be full disclosure."
At least one psychiatrist who worked on the current manual criticized the analysis. Nancy Andreasen of the University of Iowa, who headed the schizophrenia team, called the new analysis "very flawed" because it did not distinguish researchers who had ties to industry while serving on the panel from those who formed such ties afterward.
Two out of five researchers on her team had had substantial ties to industry, she said. Andreasen said she would have to check her tax statements to know whether she received money from companies at the time she worked on the panel, but said, "What I do know is that I do almost nothing with drug companies. . . . My area of research is neuroimaging, not psychopharmacology."
The analysis could not determine the extent or timing of the financial ties because it relied on disclosures in journal publications and other venues that do not mention many details, said Sheldon Krimsky, a science policy specialist at Tufts University who also was an author of the new study. Whether the researchers received money before, during or after their service on the panel did not remove the ethical concern, he said.
Krimsky, the author of the book "Science in the Private Interest," added that although more transparency is welcome, the psychiatric association should staff its panels with disinterested experts.
"When someone is establishing a clinical guideline for the bible of psychiatric diagnosis, I would argue they should have no affiliation with the drug companies in those areas where the companies could benefit from those decisions," he said.
I have no formal education in mental health but i have off books training due to a schizophrenic wife and have no problem stating beyond a shadow of a doubt,85% of inmates in the local jail where im from have schizophrenic spectrum disorders linked to microwave thats easily observable 3 days before full moons and should not be in jail but in mental health treatment as they are disabled. Im not a lawyer but ive been told in the past that courts are abusing these handicapped people under the disabilities act. That because judges are dr's in law,they know this but it would destroy the financial underpinning of the courts and invalidate the legitamacy of the legal system as fraudulent practices. Another words,organized criminal activity by all lawyers nationwide and police. The psychiatrist wrongly diagnose them so to get a contract with the jail and even push drugs on inmates to get a kickback off the jail drug contract probably via the local pharmacy. In my humble opinion.
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 14, 2021 0:57:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 14, 2021 12:34:51 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 14, 2021 15:28:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 14, 2021 15:42:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Amaterasu Solar on Nov 14, 2021 16:27:59 GMT
"$44 billion appropriated for bio-warfare research since 9-11 Being One who looks into the esoteric practices of the useless ELiters, I know They use gematria and numerology. Interesting, the word "kill" equals 44 in english ordinal gematria (a=1, b=2, c=3 on up to z=26). So. 44 billion appropriated to research killing People...makes Me raise a brow.
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 15, 2021 6:45:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 15, 2021 6:46:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 16, 2021 13:58:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 16, 2021 14:00:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 16, 2021 14:13:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 16, 2021 20:41:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 18, 2021 7:57:57 GMT
www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/did-you-know-history/measles-plague-ruined-romeA reoccuring theme continues throughout history. A certain religious sect gets blamed. This same sect owns big pharma. This sect got its true publicity in the days of the downfall of the egyptian empire. Each time an empire forms along comes a disease to wipe it out. Does this sect not realize we see them?
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 18, 2021 8:08:09 GMT
"Although Ge Hong was the first writer of traditional Chinese medicine who accurately described the symptoms of smallpox, the historian Rafe de Crespigny mused that the plagues afflicting the Eastern Han Empire during the reigns of Emperor Huan of Han (r. 146–168) and Emperor Ling of Han (r. 168–189) – with outbreaks in 151, 161, 171, 173, 179, 182, and 185 – were perhaps connected to the Antonine plague on the western end of Eurasia.[30] De Crespigny suggests that the plagues led to the rise of the cult faith healing millenarian movement led by Zhang Jue (d. 184), who instigated the disastrous Yellow Turban Rebellion (184–205).[31] He also stated that "it may be only chance" that the outbreak of the Antonine plague in 166 coincides with the Roman embassy of "Daqin" (the Roman Empire) landing in Jiaozhi (northern Vietnam) and visiting the Han court of Emperor Huan, claiming to represent "Andun" (安敦; a transliteration of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus or his predecessor Antoninus Pius).[32][33][34]
Raoul McLaughlin wrote that the Roman subjects visiting the Han Chinese court in 166 could have ushered in a new era of Roman Far East trade, but it was a "harbinger of something much more ominous" instead.[35] McLaughlin surmised that the origins of the plague lay in Central Asia, from some unknown and isolated population group, which then spread to the Chinese and the Roman worlds.[35] The plague caused "irreparable" damage to the Roman maritime trade in the Indian Ocean as proven by the archaeological record spanning from Egypt to India as well as significantly decreased Roman commercial activity in Southeast Asia.[36] However, as evidenced by the 3rd-century Periplus of the Erythraean Sea and the 6th-century Christian Topography by Cosmas Indicopleustes, Roman maritime trade into the Indian Ocean, particularly in the silk and spice trades, certainly did not cease but continued until the loss of Egypt to the Muslim Rashidun Caliphate.[37][38]"
This is from the propaganda site wiki but heres a familiar name,han! Wuhan=jewhan,khahn=cohen Central asia where the ufo alien dropka tribe is from?
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 18, 2021 8:12:51 GMT
I cant say it enough,big pharma is a jewish mafia protection racket of organised crime against the world. When their bugs dont work they get funding from government under the claim of we need to research it before it turns into a plague when really they are creating the next plague to threaten us with and then extort more money from us.
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 18, 2021 8:17:12 GMT
"According to Harper, the plague nearly saw the end of the Roman Empire, and in the period between AD 248 and 268, "the history of Rome is a confusing tangle of violent failures. The structural integrity of the imperial machine burst apart. The frontier system crumbled. The collapse of legitimacy invited one usurper after another to try for the throne. The empire fragmented and only the dramatic success of later emperors in putting the pieces back together prevented this moment from being the final act of Roman imperial history."[2]
Both the threat of imminent death from the plague and the unwavering conviction among many of the Christian clergy in the face of it won many converts to that religion.[14]" Again quote from wiki. Do you see the parrallels?
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 18, 2021 8:59:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 18, 2021 9:02:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 18, 2021 9:08:30 GMT
I saw this just posted and it was my first laugh of the day, "Lol I think the lesson is that conformity and herding behaviours aren't a good survival strategy"
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 18, 2021 10:39:16 GMT
.
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Nov 18, 2021 10:49:19 GMT
.
|
|