|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Oct 7, 2015 0:25:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Oct 7, 2015 0:36:18 GMT
What im curious about is we are allowed to share content for educational purposes. will that exemption end?If so,shouldnt it increase traffic as we create our own content.
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Oct 7, 2015 0:40:12 GMT
Also i think i heard we own content we post.that fb and ats etc.dont really own it. They have been bsing us.
|
|
|
Post by Amaterasu Solar on Oct 7, 2015 16:00:21 GMT
I avoid InfoWars. Never know what is real and what is fake. Jones blocked out the cop that was "shot in the head," hiding the fact that there was ZERO blood, and reported Charlie Hebdo as a real event. So I know that BS gets pushed through that avenue.
|
|
ArMaP
Junior Member
Posts: 75
|
Post by ArMaP on Oct 26, 2015 22:03:47 GMT
Also i think i heard we own content we post.that fb and ats etc.dont really own it. They have been bsing us. That depends on the agreement between the producer (the member) and the distributor (the site). Also, "content we post" is not the same as "content we create", just by reposting content from other people you don't get the rights to it.
|
|
|
Post by Amaterasu Solar on Oct 27, 2015 16:20:58 GMT
Also i think i heard we own content we post.that fb and ats etc.dont really own it. They have been bsing us. That depends on the agreement between the producer (the member) and the distributor (the site). Also, "content we post" is not the same as "content we create", just by reposting content from other people you don't get the rights to it. Very true. Thank You for pointing that out, ArMaP. [smile] Our thoughts are Our own; the thoughts of Others are Theirs.
|
|
|
Post by LUCKY☆ on Oct 30, 2015 3:55:52 GMT
in the usa.the ats contract is invalid.its a con,to make folks believe so.if im correct. Its like two bank robbers signing a contract.or in this case,a bank and bank robber signing a contract.
|
|
ArMaP
Junior Member
Posts: 75
|
Post by ArMaP on Nov 8, 2015 0:19:30 GMT
in the usa.the ats contract is invalid. Why?
|
|